John A. Kirk, Martin Luther King, Jr.: Profiles in Power (New York: Longman, 2004).

Подробнее о социологии общественных движений см.: G. Davis, D. McAdam, & W. Scott, Social Movements and Organizations (New York: Cambridge University, 2005); Robert Crain & Rita Mahard, “The Consequences of Controversy Accompanying Institutional Change: The Case of School Desegregation”, American Sociological Review 47, № 6 (1982): 697–708; Azza Salama Layton, “International Pressure and the U. S. Government’s Response to Little Rock”, Arkansas Historical Quarterly 56, № 3 (1997): 257–72; Brendan Nelligan, “The Albany Movement and the Limits of Nonviolent Protest in Albany, Georgia, 1961–1962”, Providence College Honors Thesis, 2009; Charles Tilly, Social Movements, 1768–2004 (London: Paradigm, 2004); Andrew Walder, “Political Sociology and Social Movements”, Annual Review of Sociology 35 (2009): 393–412; Paul Almeida, Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925–2005 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2008); Robert Benford, “An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective”, Sociological Inquiry 67, № 4 (1997): 409–30; Robert Benford & David Snow, “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment”, Annual Review of Sociology 26 (2000): 611–39; Michael Burawoy, Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1979); Carol Conell & Kim Voss, “Formal Organization and the Fate of Social Movements: Craft Association and Class Alliance in the Knights of Labor”, American Sociological Review 55, № 2 (1990): 255–69; James Davies, “Toward a Theory of Revolution”, American Sociological Review 27, № 1 (1962): 5–18; William Gamson, The Strategy of Social Protest (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1975); Robert Benford, “An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective”, Sociological Inquiry 67, № 4 (1997): 409–30; Jeff Goodwin, No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991 (New York: Cambridge University, 2001); Jeff Goodwin & James Jasper, eds., Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003); Roger Gould, “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871”, American Sociological Review 56, № 6 (1991): 716–29; Joseph Gusfield, “Social Structure and Moral Reform: A Study of the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union”, American Journal of Sociology 61, № 3 (1955): 221–31; Doug McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1982); Doug McAdam, “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer”, American Journal of Sociology 92, № 1 (1986): 64–90; Doug McAdam, “The Biographical Consequences of Activism,” American Sociological Review 54, № 5 (1989): 744–60; Doug McAdam, “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions”, Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. Doug McAdam, John McCarthy & Mayer Zald (New York: Cambridge University, 1996); Doug McAdam & Ronnelle Paulsen, “Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism”, American Journal of Sociology 99, № 3 (1993): 640–67; D. McAdam, S. Tarrow, & C. Tilly, Dynamics of Contention (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2001); Judith Stepan-Norris and Judith Zeitlin, “‘Who Gets the Bird?’ or, How the Communists Won Power and Trust in America’s Unions”, American Sociological Review 54, № 4 (1989): 503–23; Charles Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1978).