233
Pollock and Maitland, vol. 1, History of English Law, pp. 615-616.
234
Act II, Scene 5; A. L. Rowse, The England of Elizabeth (London, 1964), p. 335.
235
Dowell, History of Taxation 1, p. 150.
236
Preamble to the Act of Parliament, in Dowell, History of Taxation 1, p. 133; 25 Henry VIII, c.21.
237
Conyers Read, «Good Queen Bess», American Historical Review, XXXI, No. 4, July 1926, p. 647.
238
Dowell, History of Taxation, 1, p. 148.
239
Rowse, England of Elizabeth, p. 339.
240
Ibid., p. 158.
241
R. В. Wernham, Before the Armada (London, 1966), pp. 296-297; Sinclair, Public Revenues of the British Empire, vol. 1, p. 217.
242
Dowell, History of Taxation 1, p. 148.
243
Read, «Good Queen Bess», p. 661.
244
Rowse, England of Elizabeth, p. 338.
245
Stephen Dowell, A History of Taxation and Taxes in Engfand, vol. 2 (London, 1965, reprint of 1884 edition), p. 39.
246
Ibid., p. 40.
247
William Kennedy, English Taxation 1640-1799 (London, 1913, reprint 1964), p. 42.
248
Dowell, History of Taxation 2, p. 8.
249
Sinclair, Public Revenues of the British Empire, 1, p. 283.
250
Ibid., p. 316.
251
J. Н. Plumb, Sir Robert Walpole vol. 2 (Clifton, N. 1., 1973), p. 239.
252
Kennedy, English Taxation, pp. 99-109.
253
Edward Hughes, Studies in Administration and Finance 1558-1825 (Manchester, 1934), pp. 291-304. Прекрасное изложение дебатов по соляному налогу, чрезвычайно критичное в отношении Уолпола.
